Autonomous growth infrastructureLead generation · Programmatic SEONo. — · --:--:-- UTC
In short

Agenclaw's Lead Generation engine is autonomous software that sources, verifies and scores B2B leads against your ICP — no manual list-building, no generic firmographic filters. Five specialist AI agents produce each verified contact, complete with a written reason it fits, deliverability-checked. You pay per verified lead delivered; rejected leads are never billed.

Engine 01

Leads that come with a reason attached.

Define who you sell to. The line sources, enriches, scores and verifies every contact — and writes down why each one fits — before anything reaches your dashboard. You pay $60 per verified lead, not per hour of someone else's research.

See lead gen pricing
What you actually buy

One unit. Four things in it.

A "lead" from Agenclaw isn't a name and a guess. It's a verified contact, a fit score against your own ICP, and a written reason — every time.

Sample unitillustration
CompanyMid-market SaaS, 80–200 FTE
ContactVP-level, RevOps
EmailVerified · deliverable
LinkedInMatched · confidence high
Fit scoreScored against your ICP
Written rationale"Recently posted three open RevOps roles and migrated their CRM in the last two quarters — matches your 'actively scaling GTM ops' signal directly, not just firmographic overlap."

Most vendors hand you a spreadsheet of names that fit a firmographic filter — same industry, same headcount band — and call it qualified. That's a filter, not a judgement.

Every lead that reaches you has a rationale written against your ICP definition, not a generic template. If the reasoning is thin, the lead doesn't ship — it goes back to the sourcing stage.

Every contact passes a deliverability check and an evidence gate before it reaches you — if we can't verify it, we don't send it, and you're not billed for it. What does arrive comes with the reason it matched your ICP and the source it was checked against.

Every lead includes

Five fields, every time.

  • →Identity: Full name + verified job title
  • →Company: Name, size band, industry, website
  • →Contact: Deliverability-checked work email + LinkedIn URL
  • →Match logic: One line on why this lead fits your ICP
  • →Source: Which channel surfaced them
The pipeline

Real agents, one job each.

No agent does two jobs — the agent that sources a candidate is never the one that decides if it's good enough.

A6 · ICP Interpreter
Your ICP becomes a run definition

Turns your two-minute form into a machine-readable ICP spec.

A7 / A8 · Sourcer / Enricher
Candidates are found and filled in

Finds matching companies and people — every row backed by evidence. Finds and SMTP-verifies work emails. No verification, no delivery.

A9 · Qualifier
Each candidate is scored and the reasoning is written down

Scores fit 0–100 with a reason — sub-criteria always sum to the score.

A10 · Compliance Sentinel
Suppression and deliverability are checked before you ever see a contact

Pure code, no LLM. Blocks role accounts, suppressed contacts, GDPR/CAN-SPAM/KVKK violations.

Where it lands

The dashboard behind the numbers.

Every delivered lead and published page lands in one place — counted, charted, ready to export. This is a styled illustration of that layout, not a live screenshot; the numbers below are examples, not a real account's data.

Dashboard overviewillustration — not a live screenshot
Total Leads Delivered128
Articles Published14
Average QC Score87/100
30-day performance
Lead credits: 42 availablepSEO credits: 9 availableActive jobs: 1 running
Straight talk

What this replaces, and what it doesn't.

ReplacesManual list-buildingThe hours an SDR or a junior researcher spends building and cleaning a prospect list by hand.
ReplacesGeneric data exportsBulk contact exports scored by firmographic filters alone, with no written reasoning behind the match.
Doesn't replaceYour sales conversationWe hand you a verified contact and a reason to reach out — the outreach and the close are still yours.
Doesn't replaceICP strategyThe machine scores against the definition you give it. A vague ICP produces vague fits — garbage in, garbage out still applies.
Buying models

Three ways to get leads. One bill you can see through.

In-house and agency retainers both have real strengths — this isn't a strawman. What changes here is the unit you're buying: a person's time, a monthly retainer, or a verified lead.

Manual / in-houseAgency retainerAgenclaw
What you pay forA salary and benefits, whether that week's output is high or low.A monthly fee, usually tied to a minimum activity or list-size commitment.Each verified lead actually delivered — nothing else.
Output guaranteeNone on paper — output depends on that person's day, tools and skill.Contracted activity or volume targets, not a guarantee every lead fits.Every lead is deliverability-checked and evidence-backed before it's billed — not a promise, a gate.
Ramp timeHiring and onboarding — often weeks before the first list ships.An onboarding call and ICP handoff before the first batch comes back.Define your ICP and start a run the same day.
Cancel / exitNotice period and severance — and their knowledge leaves with them.Bound by the contract term and notice period the agency sets.Stop buying credits whenever you want — no contract, no notice period.
Quality controlDirect and hands-on — you see and correct the work yourself.Run inside the agency's own process, which you mostly see secondhand.Every lead ships with a written reason it fits your ICP, plus a deliverability check.
How it scalesHire more people — volume grows in step with headcount.Renegotiate the retainer or contract for more volume.Buy more credits — no renegotiation, no new contract.
Data ownershipFully yours, wherever your own team keeps it.Often lives inside the agency's tools — varies by contract.Yours in your dashboard, exportable any time.
Real advantageTotal control and firsthand product knowledge no outside vendor has.Human judgment on messaging and relationships, from people who do this daily.No fixed cost while you're finding out if it works, and no one to manage.
Run your own numbers

ROI calculator.

Every default below is an assumption, not a claim — edit anything to match your own situation. This shows two monthly costs side by side; what the difference means for you is your call, not ours.

Starting example — set this to your own monthly volume.
Assumption — edit with your own number (salary, benefits, tools).
Assumption — edit with your own number.
Manual / in-house$15,0002 SDRs needed × $7,500/mo each
Agenclaw$2,39840 × $59.96 per verified lead
Difference (in-house − Agenclaw)+$12,602/mo

A simplified model: in-house assumes whole SDR headcount (you can't hire a fraction of a person) and excludes management overhead, tooling and ramp time. Agenclaw's rate is pulled live from current pricing. Positive difference means in-house costs more at these numbers; negative means Agenclaw does — read the numbers, draw your own conclusion.

Send the hunt.